Skip to main content

Axie Infinity Just Restarted Transactions After $615 Million Hack

Axie Infinity Just Restarted Transactions After $615 Million Hack
Image Source: ( google image )

In March, more than $615 million was stolen from Ronin Network's bank accounts. This news was sensational at the time because it involved the largest play–to-earn (P2E) game in the world, Axie Infinity.

After the attack on Ronin's bridge, transactions were stopped. The last two large-ticket transfers to the network were fraudulent withdrawals worth 173,600ETH and 25.5million USDC. An FBI report reveals that the hacking group Lazarus Group was responsible for stealing the ill-gotten wealth to finance North Korea's regime.


More News: Latest NFT News


After the theft

So what happened with Axie Infinity's player base? Binance provided a bridge that allowed users to retrieve funds stored on the Ronin Network. The bridge allowed them the ability to withdraw their funds using wrapped ETH. Standard ETH could then be traded. This led to approximately 46,000 WITH being taken out of Ronin Network's stores since the April 2 announcement. Except that it was nothing.


As of earlier today, Ronin Network had been completely rebuilt.


Ronin Network, Axie Infinity, and Sky Mavis stated that they are now open to transactions on the network. Sky Mavis also covered the remaining 71.600 ETH and 25.5M losses due to the attack. "All [users] are made whole," the announcement said.


It is an entirely different story about the Axie DAO's treasury funds. They still haven't been able to locate the 56,000 ETH stolen during the attack. If these funds do not get recovered for two years, a vote by Axie ADAO will be called to discuss the next steps of the treasury.


Sky Mavis has increased security for the Ronin Network to stop another attack on this scale. The network's "circuit breaker" system will detect suspicious withdrawals and alert Sky Mavis. 90 percent of validator signatures are required for withdrawals of more than $1,000,000. 


Withdrawals greater than $10,000,000 in value, however, will only require that 90% of validator signs be signed. A seven-day review will also be needed for an actual person. Monthly withdrawal limits for users have been set at $50 million. Sky Mavis's internal audit was conducted by an independent third party to identify additional ways to enhance security.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are Gas Fees and How Can We Fix Them?

Blockchain transactions were very affordable prior to 2020. With the rise of Web3 & NFTs, mandatory blockchain transaction charges -- also known by gas fees -- are now the greatest barrier to mainstream adoption. Network congestion is what determines the gas price for blockchains like Bitcoin or Ethereum. The network congestion is the reason why the gas fees are higher for more people. Web3's ethos of inclusivity and democracy means that this fundamental scaling problem largely challenges those core tenants. Although gas can seem quite simple in concept, it can be quite complicated under the hood. This explanation explains gas fees and how they work. It also explains what Ethereum and other Blockchains can do to make them cheaper. What's a gas charge?   Gas fees, as defined in our dictionary are payments made to complete transactions on a blockchain. These fees are paid to blockchain miners to cover the computing power required to verify transactions on blockchain. These

Should NFT Creators Expect Royalties? Sudoswap Says No

Reator royalties have been a major part of the NFT market over the years.   Artists of all faiths were able to survive in the early days Web3.0 creative economy by a combination of primary sales and kickbacks from secondary market royalties. Despite being crucial, creator royalties are not hard-coded into any smart contracts.   Creator royalties  also known as creator fees  are an option that is used to reserve a percentage of secondary sales (peer to peer trades), and send it back to the NFTs originalator. Most collectors don't mind paying an artist a royalty fee when collecting secondaries.   It's almost impossible to avoid paying creator royalty fees in the NFT space, even though it is an option.   This could be either a good thing or a bad thing depending on your source. Decentralized payments are made through centralized means. OpenSea is an example: When an artist's NFT sells in the secondary market on OS the platform receives the royalty through the transaction.   Op

What the Proposed Crypto Bill Could Mean for NFTs

After months of speculation about the possibility of a new U.S. regulator focusing on cryptocurrency, U.S. Senators Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) from the Senate Banking Committee and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) from the Senate Agriculture Committee introduced bipartisan legislation on Tuesday. Although the  document's 69-page length  doesn't deal with NFTs, it provides important information to determine if a token should be classified as a commodity rather than a security.' More News: Latest NFT News Definition of "digital assets" as well as 'virtual currencies In its current version, Lummis and Gillibrand's bill defines a "digital asset' as an electronic asset that grants access rights for economic or proprietary reasons or powers, including virtual currencies and payment stablecoins. The bill defines "virtual currency" as a digital asset used "primarily" as a medium for exchange, the unit of account, or store of value that is not supp